Interim Results

Aukett Fitzroy Robinson Group Plc, the international practice of architects and interior design specialists, announces its interim results for the six months ended 30 September 2009.

Key highlights

• 27% fall in group revenue to £8.2m (2008: £11.3m) as a result of the continuing depressed property markets in the UK and Continental Europe.
• Good performance from Russian operation with stable revenue and profits increasing to £595,000 (2008: £264,000).
• One off costs in the UK of £945,000 relating to restructuring and relocation.
• Group loss before tax of £1.2m (2008: profit of £1.2m)
• Cash balances of £1.2m exceed debt of £0.9m
• Within the UK we have obtained planning approval for twelve major projects with a combined construction value of £1.5bn
• 36% reduction in UK staffing levels will produce an annualised saving of £2.9m

Nicholas Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of Aukett Fitzroy Robinson commented:

“In the face of the steady downward trend in our markets we have progressively taken steps to reduce our operating costs. Given the size of our secured, but uninstructed order book, we remain confident that we will be able to trade through this downturn and return to growth with our long term client base as and when market sentiment and economic activity improves.”

Enquiries

Aukett Fitzroy Robinson – 020 7636 8033

Nicholas Thompson, Chief Executive Officer
Duncan Harper, Group Finance Director

FinnCap – 020 7600 1658
Sam Smith
Clive Carver

Hermes Financial PR

Chris Steele 07979 604 687
chris.steele@hermesfinancialpr.co.uk

Trevor Phillips 07889 153 628
trevor.phillips@hermesfinancialpr.co.uk

Tarquin Edwards 07879 458 364
tarquin.edwards@hermesfinancialpr.co.uk

Interim statement

Overview

We have highlighted in previous reports the inevitable impact on the property industry of the global economic recession. These interim results now clearly reflect the depressed level of activity in the property market throughout our network, particularly in the UK and Continental Europe. This downturn has been compounded by a reduction in availability of funding for new developments with consequential delays to a number of projects.

Against this background the group produced a loss before tax in the first six months of £1,216,000 (2008: profit £1,182,000).

Summary of results

Revenue for the first six months decreased to £8,177,000 (2008: £11,277,000), a fall of 27% principally from the reduced number of project opportunities and a decline in client instructions beyond the planning phase of projects.

An operating loss of £1,284,000 (2008: Profit £1,193,000) reversed last year’s result. After accounting for joint venture profits of £73,000 (2008: loss £13,000), net interest payable of £5,000 (2008: receivable £2,000) and a taxation credit of £358,000 (2008: charge £380,000) the loss for the period was £858,000 (2008: profit £802,000).

During the period the group incurred a number of one-off costs reflecting the changing nature of the markets and the need to reduce our on-going exposure to certain expenditures. These costs amounted to £945,000 and more details of the three amounts making up this sum are given below.

In these turbulent conditions our group net cash position has held up at £238,000 (2008: £1,652,000) compared to our year end position of £410,000.

Operations

The impact of the global economic downturn has been felt across our network of offices in reduced activity levels, notably in the UK, where revenues fell by £2,716,000 to £5,512,000 (2008: £8,228,000) reflecting a 33% reduction.

Twelve planning applications with a construction value of £1.5bn were in progress during the period and of these ten have so far received consent. However, to date only two of these schemes, with a construction value of £40m, have proceeded to the next stage reflecting the cautiousness in the client market due to tenant scarcity and also the general lack of funding due to the terms imposed by lenders for equity participation from developers.

During the period the UK moved its main office location resulting in a number of one-off costs amounting to £475,000.

The most significant factor affecting the UK results related to operations in the Middle East. A re-appraisal of on-going projects resulted in some fees being renegotiated and others being delayed whilst such negotiations took place. This reduced revenue in the period by some £585,000. Additionally, the UK operation retained a number of staff in excess of the optimum in respect of a project that was won in February but later had the award withdrawn. Up to 40 staff would have been allocated to the project had it proceeded. This resulted in additional staff costs in the period of £120,000.

Internationally Russia’s performance was mixed with a number of major projects being cancelled or delayed due to funding difficulties in the early part of the financial year. This was offset by the success in winning a new mixed use scheme on the Moscow River totalling more than 5,200,000 sq ft. of development in January 2009. Revenue remained largely unchanged at £1,908,000 (2008: £1,874,000) with profits of 31% (£595,000). However there remains a residual level of uncertainty on all projects in the current economic environment.

Continental Europe suffered from a similar decline in activity to the UK with revenues falling to £757,000 (2008: £1,175,000) a decline of 36%. Such a rapid reduction in revenue negates the possibility of achieving a profit and the small loss produced is considered a success in the circumstances.

The improving performance of our associate in Berlin was encouraging where, after many years of minimal profits, a number of projects have been won including the Bundesdruckerei development and the Louisencenter retail development.

Finally, the group has three major claims for fees under existing contracts with clients. Two of these claims relate to additional work performed whilst the third relates to the fee due where recovery litigation is at an advanced stage

The directors have made estimates that they consider reasonable and prudent of the most probable outcome of these three claims based upon available information including historical precedents and professional advice. However, a different outcome from any of these claims from that anticipated could increase or decrease the group’s year end results. Any associated costs have been written-off as incurred.

People

The decline in group revenue has necessitated the need to address staff levels, particularly in the UK. Over the past twelve months we have reduced staff numbers in the UK by 22% covering both agency and permanent staff including a reduction in the number of practice directors. The cost of this action resulted in one-off costs of £350,000. Further staff reductions currently in progress increase the reduction to 36% which will result in annualised savings of £2.9m.

It is a necessary aspect of our business that we retain resource capacity in the sectors in which we operate and therefore there will remain an element of over-employment until development activity reaches a new, and probably lower, equilibrium.

As part of our long term aim to support the business as it grows we are pleased to announce that Anthony Simmonds, a qualified accountant and former senior partner of a top 50 accountancy practice, will be joining the board as an Independent Non-Executive Director.

Dividends

The half year loss and consequent reduced cashflow has negated the ability of the group to pay an interim dividend. The Board will review the position at the year end with a view to restoring the dividend when profits and cashflow allow.

Prospects

At this moment we see no firm evidence of any upturn and therefore in the short term management attention will focus on the continuing need to lower our cost base to reflect current trading activity. In the longer term, when markets recover, we will revert to our corporate objective to increase revenues to £25m.

Given the steps already taken to reduce our operating costs and in view of our considerable secured, but uninstructed order book, we remain confident that we will be able to trade through this downturn and return to growth with our long term client base as and when market sentiment and economic activity improves.

18 June 2009

Independent review report to Aukett Fitzroy Robinson Group Plc

Introduction

We have been engaged by the company to review the condensed set of financial statements in the half-yearly financial report for the six months ended 31 March 2009 which comprises the consolidated income statement, consolidated statement of recognised income and expense, consolidated balance sheet, consolidated cash flow statement, and the related explanatory notes 1 to 9. We have read the other information contained in the half-yearly financial report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the information in the condensed set of financial statements

This report, including the conclusion, has been prepared for and only for the company for the purpose of meeting the requirements of the AIM Rules for Companies and for no other purpose. We do not, therefore, in producing this report, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.

Directors’ responsibilities

The half-yearly financial report is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the directors. The directors are responsible for preparing and presenting the half-yearly financial report in accordance with the AIM Rules for Companies.

As disclosed in noted 1, the annual financial statements of the group are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”) pronouncements as adopted by the European Union.

The condensed set of financial statements included in this half-yearly financial report has been prepared in accordance with the measurement and recognition criteria of International Financial Reporting Standards and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”) pronouncements, as adopted by the European Union.

Our responsibility

Our responsibility is to express to the company a conclusion on the condensed set of financial statements in the half-yearly financial report based on our review.

Scope of review

We conducted our review in accordance with International Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410, “Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity” issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom. A review of interim financial information consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.

Conclusion

Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the condensed set of financial statements in the half-yearly financial report for the six months ended 31 March 2009 is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the measurement and recognition criteria of International Financial Reporting Standards and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”) pronouncements as adopted by the European Union, and the AIM Rules for Companies.

Baker Tilly UK Audit LLP

Chartered Accountants

2 Bloomsbury Street

London, WC1B 3ST

18 June 2009

Consolidated income statement For the six months ended 31 March 2009

Consolidated statement of recognised income and expense For the six months ended 31 March 2009

Consolidated balance sheet At 31 March 2009

Consolidated cash flow statement For the six months ended 31 March 2009

Notes to the interim results

1    Basis of preparation

The financial information presented in this interim report has been prepared in accordance with the recognition and measurement principles of International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as adopted by the EU that are expected to be applicable to the financial statements for the year ending 30 September 2009 and on the basis of the accounting policies expected to be used in those financial statements. The significant accounting policies of the group are set out below.

2    Segmental reporting

The group’s operations currently comprise a single business segment and three separately reportable geographical segments.

Geographical segments are based on the location of the group’s offices from which the services are delivered. Group level activities (such as finance and marketing) are integrated within the United Kingdom operations and hence their costs are reported within the United Kingdom segment. The group’s associate and joint ventures are all based in Continental Europe.

The geographical split of revenue based on the location of project sites was:

3    Earnings per share

The calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share are based on the following data:

4    Dividends

5    Reconciliation of profit before income tax to net cash generated from operations

6    Analysis of net funds

7    Consolidated statement of changes in equity

For the six months ended 31 March 2009

For the six months ended 31 March 2008

For the year ended 30 September 2008

8    Status of interim results

The interim results cover the six months ended 31 March 2009 and were approved by the board of directors on 18 June 2009. The interim results are unaudited but have been reviewed by the auditors in accordance with International Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410, “Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity” issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom.

The interim condensed set of consolidated financial statements in the interim report are not statutory accounts as defined by Section 240 of the Companies Act 1985.

Comparative figures for the year ended 30 September 2008 have been extracted from the statutory accounts of the group for that period

The statutory accounts for the year ended 30 September 2008 have been reported on by the group’s auditors and delivered to the Registrar of Companies. The audit report thereon was unqualified, did not include references to matters which the auditors drew attention by way of emphasis without qualifying the report, and did not contain a statement under Sections 237(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 1985.

9    Further information

Copies of the interim report will be dispatched to holders of 10,000 or more shares in due course. Copies will also be available on the company’s website (www.aukettfitzroyrobinson.com) and from the registered office of the company (36-40 York Way, London, N1 9AB).

END